TO-WIT: THE PAD OF
FRIENDSHIP
by S. Sponte, Esq.
I am sitting alone at my desk now, long
past working hours. Its very
gloomy, both outside and in.
Slowly I take out the ancient yellow pad from my lower right desk drawer
and slowly I cross off yet another name.
Forty years ago there were a lot of names on this list, but now few
remain, making every additional loss all the more excruciating.
This all started when
I received my semiannual notice from the court to serve as an arbitrator, one
of a three lawyer panel to act as judge and jury for the smaller civil
cases. Though some colleagues
gripe and moan about the obligation, IÕve always kind of liked it. It helps fulfill my fantasy of being a
judge without having to spend a lot of time and money kissing butt to get
elected while pretending to be, God forbid, just one of the guys.
Now normally these
arbitration hearings are pretty laid-back affairs. The lawyers present their cases in a relaxed, less stressful
environment than trial. If during
the hearing anyone raises an evidentiary objection, we arbitrators always
confer before making our guess. At
hearingÕs end all shake hands, the litigants and attorneys leave, and we
arbitrators then make a decision based on as much of the facts and law as we
either understand or care to acknowledge on that day and in that place.
As it happened, one of the attorneys trying the
case assigned to my panel that day was an old time friend of more than thirty
years, a good lawyer, honest, smart, ethical and fair. In my book heÕs always been a
winner. But not today.
Oh sure, I could have
overlooked both the law and the facts to find in his favor. And sure, I didnÕt have to spend
fifteen minutes at hearingÕs end convincing the other two arbitrators that
their instincts to rule in his favor were errant. But on that day and in that place, I thought I knew what I
was doing. I was also temporarily
cursed by the courage of my convictions, and in combination, thatÕs as deadly a
duo to conviviality as exists in this profession.
He was waiting for me
outside the hearing room, beaming a smile and giving me an inquisitive thumbs
up gesture, gleeful hope radiating from his face. I smiled back, raised my thumb skyward, then turned it down. The hope drained from his face,
instantly replaced by the pallor of rage.
He first hurled a string of epithets at me, followed up by his
briefcase. It struck the door to
the hearing room just behind my head, slamming it shut with a sickening
thud. (Get the symbolism?)
ÒEven the magistrate
got this one right,Ó he screamed as he stormed off, and I have to confess I was
hurt. IÕve been called dumb
before, but never that dumb.
Weeks have now gone by,
and he hasnÕt spoken a word to me.
I see him at lunch, we pass in the street, thereÕs no response. To him, its as if IÕm dead. So tonight I took out the pad of
friendship and did what I had to do.
I will miss him.
At times like these I
try to assuage my angst by reminding myself that things like this happen in our
adversarial profession and that, for my part, I must never give in to such base
human responses. I am better than
that.
Its no easy feat, believe me, but at times like
this it helps to summon up all those many hours I spent with my erstwhile
friend and to recall that in reality he isnÕt all that smart, his table manners
are quite atrocious and his golf game really sucks.
î2009, S. Sponte, Esq.